Central Africa Record

Central Africa

Where basic drinking water coverage rose or fell in Central Africa

Cameroon’s estimate for at least basic drinking water rose from 55.8% of the population in 2000 to 71.4% in 2024. The Central African Republic moved from 59.0% to 36.5%.

Sources checked

Geographic comparisonBasic drinking water coverage in five Central African countries
Basic drinking water coverage in five Central African countries
  1. Gabon88.6%
  2. Chad52.2%

Natural Earth land outlines and dashed land boundaries.

Select a capital marker to see the corresponding national share. The Republic of the Congo has older observations in the table.

Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4

At least basic drinking water, 2000 to 2024

Shared scale from zero to 100.00 %. A gap marks a year without an observation.

Cameroon

Cameroon · %2000: 55.80 · 2001: 56.70 · 2002: 57.50 · 2003: 58.30 · 2004: 59.10 · 2005: 59.90 · 2006: 60.60 · 2007: 61.40 · 2008: 62.10 · 2009: 62.80 · 2010: 63.50 · 2011: 64.10 · 2012: 64.80 · 2013: 65.40 · 2014: 66.00 · 2015: 66.60 · 2016: 67.20 · 2017: 67.70 · 2018: 68.30 · 2019: 68.80 · 2020: 69.30 · 2021: 69.80 · 2022: 70.30 · 2023: 70.70 · 2024: 71.40

20002024

71.40 % · 2024

Central African Republic

Central African Republic · %2000: 59.00 · 2001: 57.80 · 2002: 56.70 · 2003: 55.50 · 2004: 54.30 · 2005: 53.20 · 2006: 52.00 · 2007: 50.90 · 2008: 49.80 · 2009: 48.70 · 2010: 47.60 · 2011: 46.50 · 2012: 45.50 · 2013: 44.40 · 2014: 43.40 · 2015: 42.30 · 2016: 41.30 · 2017: 40.20 · 2018: 39.20 · 2019: 38.20 · 2020: 37.20 · 2021: 36.20 · 2022: 36.30 · 2023: 36.40 · 2024: 36.50

20002024

36.50 % · 2024

Chad

Chad · %2000: 38.60 · 2001: 39.20 · 2002: 39.80 · 2003: 40.40 · 2004: 41.00 · 2005: 41.60 · 2006: 42.20 · 2007: 42.80 · 2008: 43.40 · 2009: 44.00 · 2010: 44.60 · 2011: 45.20 · 2012: 45.80 · 2013: 46.50 · 2014: 47.10 · 2015: 47.80 · 2016: 48.40 · 2017: 49.10 · 2018: 49.80 · 2019: 50.50 · 2020: 51.20 · 2021: 51.90 · 2022: 52.00 · 2023: 52.10 · 2024: 52.20

20002024

52.20 % · 2024

Gabon

Gabon · %2000: 80.10 · 2001: 80.60 · 2002: 81.10 · 2003: 81.50 · 2004: 82.00 · 2005: 82.50 · 2006: 82.90 · 2007: 83.30 · 2008: 83.70 · 2009: 84.10 · 2010: 84.50 · 2011: 84.90 · 2012: 85.30 · 2013: 85.60 · 2014: 86.00 · 2015: 86.30 · 2016: 86.60 · 2017: 86.90 · 2018: 87.20 · 2019: 87.50 · 2020: 87.70 · 2021: 88.00 · 2022: 88.20 · 2023: 88.50 · 2024: 88.60

20002024

88.60 % · 2024

DR Congo

DR Congo · %2000: 37.50 · 2001: 37.50 · 2002: 37.50 · 2003: 37.40 · 2004: 37.40 · 2005: 37.30 · 2006: 37.30 · 2007: 37.20 · 2008: 37.10 · 2009: 37.00 · 2010: 36.90 · 2011: 36.80 · 2012: 36.70 · 2013: 36.60 · 2014: 36.40 · 2015: 36.30 · 2016: 36.20 · 2017: 36.00 · 2018: 35.90 · 2019: 35.70 · 2020: 35.50 · 2021: 35.30 · 2022: 35.10 · 2023: 35.40 · 2024: 35.70

20002024

35.70 % · 2024

Republic of the Congo

Republic of the Congo · %2000: 58.40 · 2001: 58.70 · 2002: 59.20 · 2003: 59.70 · 2004: 60.60 · 2005: 61.60 · 2006: 62.50 · 2007: 63.40 · 2008: 64.40 · 2009: 65.30 · 2010: 66.30 · 2011: 67.20 · 2012: 68.10 · 2013: 69.00 · 2014: 70.00 · 2015: 70.90 · 2016: 71.80 · 2017: 72.70 · 2018: 72.90 · 2019: 73.10 · 2020: 73.30 · 2021: 73.50

20002024

73.50 % · 2021

WHO and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme estimates via World Bank WDI

Cameroon and Chad gained over the period

Cameroon’s estimate increased by about 15.6 percentage points from 2000 to 2024. Chad’s moved from 38.6% to 52.2%, an increase of about 13.6 points. Gabon increased from 80.1% to 88.6%. Source 1

Coverage fell in the Central African Republic

The estimate was 59.0% in 2000, 47.6% in 2010 and 36.5% in 2024. DR Congo was at 35.7% in 2024, down from 37.6% in 2000. The Republic of the Congo’s last available estimate was 73.5% in 2021. Source 1

A basic service combines source and collection time

Eligible sources can include piped water, a borehole, a protected well or spring, or packaged or delivered water. An improved source that takes more than 30 minutes to reach, queue at and return from falls below the basic threshold. Source 2

Safely managed drinking water uses a higher threshold

The basic-or-better figure includes households that meet the safely managed standard, but the basic threshold does not by itself demonstrate availability when needed or freedom from contamination. Use the separate safely managed series for those conditions. Source 2

Sources

Open the data and source notes